Response to Finnivan's: Q&A 7, Answer

I think your judgment is very precise.

I was thinking that what if the measurement for human interference should be based primarily on the type of animal we are dealing with. If the animals is a social one, we can interact with them insofar as we do not harm their liberty nor endanger ourselves. So it may not necessarily mean these animals end up in zoos or aquariums. On the other hand, if the animal is solitary then we may want to exercise more caution towards our intrusion into its personal space. We also have to ask whether an animals liberty is more important than saving its life at the cost of its liberty.